What are those wind ropes which keep planets in their orbits in the vedic view on things? Are those composed of aether, the ropes? Is there still scalar energy above this governing all this and giving matter it's particular form every single moment? Or is it embedded in aether. We can say from vedas, that it's not, for the 5 gross material elements are: earth (smell), water (taste), fire (seeing), air (thouch sensation), and aether (hearing). And above those are, 3 subtle material elements, which are: mind (manas, sattvic or in goodness naturally), intelligence (buddhi, rajarsic meaning, it naturally rises from passion) and wrong sense of self (ahankara, tamasic or naturally rises from ignorance). Third of these could be also Paramaatma, or the Supersoul, which is above 3 gunas or main building blocks of the cosmos, the 3 elements (sattva, rajas, tamas) and above 5 gross material elements, and still above also all the 3 subtle elements. That's why it is said that, where there is Light, there's no tamas, or darkness there!!
ASA* [UG] - One place Srila Prabhupada, the Bhagavata, says that the planets are held in location by "wind ropes". The second of the five gross elements in Prana, Vayu, air, tactile force. A Karate guy can manipulate this. Narada Muni travels on air-waves. An electrical wire is a "tunnel" to electricity. So gravity we see as Prana, no?
UG - In the Vedic model we understand each element is a subset of the previous, so everything is Mahat-tattva, then all the five gross elements are subsets of aether, space.
Was it this or that way, the Allais effect proves general relativity's gravity wrong, during solar eclipses
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allais_effect
one possible explanation:
http://astronomy-links.net/Allais.html
The push or shadow gravity... the Lesage's gravity... closer to Tesla's views too? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation it explains big bodies as shields from bombardment of ultra-mundane corpuscles which would be pushing the objects. Closer to truth taking on account also the governing aether Force's winds and movements, effects and nature?? Anyway the proof from experiments keep on stocking up and there has never been any contrary results, only neutral, and gravitational increase, no decrease as GR (general relativity) proposes.
Hey Clark, I have to keep on saving this essay to places, and thank you. I couldn't find your contact, but I can be contacted through: http://www.hc-teatteri.weebly.com/ ,
next is from: http://astronomy-links.net/Allais.html
:::::: ::::::Allais Gravitational Anomaly Resolved:::::: ::::::
Clark M. Thomas
© January 24, 2015
[INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS: Although the essay below is succinct and elegant - it does not go into many details needed by most readers, especially by those who are only familiar with General Relativity, and associated gravitational ethers and membranes. This essay is like the visible portion of an iceberg. There are, however, multiple helpful links within these paragraphs. Most readers would be well served to study all of the links herein, and learn how the iceberg below supports the iceberg above the waves.]
The Allais effect, or gravitational anomaly, is named after the French Nobel laureate (in economics) who described and tried to explain changes to gravity during a solar eclipse, as measured by his paraconical pendulum.
This brief gravity increase has never been explained using currently popular theories of gravity, but is easily explained with a 21st century version of push gravity with the help of gravitational lenses. In so doing, it provides a satisfactory answer, and challenges General Relativity gravity, which has no explanation.
Both General Relativity's curved space, and Le Sage's original push gravity, are expected to give similar results during a total eclipse. Both theories seem to predict that there will be a brief and slight DECREASE in gravity in the eclipse's full shadow. However, there is a slight "Allais" gravitational INCREASE when measured by pendulums in the full shadow.
In GR, a decrease would be due to two stacked depressions in the gravitational membrane. That increases the "tractor beam" effect during a full solar eclipse, so that the new "pull away" from Earth's "pull in" would yield lower net weight. In classical push/shadow gravity, there would be a combined blocking of incoming particles, leading to a very temporary decrease in gravity. Something else needs to come into play to turn an expected decrease into a measured increase.
Any theory of gravity MUST be valid at all dimensions. General Relativity fails to explain gravitational anomalies within the half-billion light years radius. In contrast, push gravity clearly describes effects on that scale. What about gravitational anomalies much closer to our home, as during solar eclipses?
Because GR is a failed gravity theory, there is left only one candidate theory, if "push" theory can describe the Allais effect, and it can! There is a missing element simultaneously occurring with standard push/shadow net forces, and this missing element is found within the category of "gravitational lenses." Astronomers use gravitational lenses to see background objects that could not otherwise be detected. A well known example of such lenses is the so-called Einstein Cross:
The Einstein Cross is an example of visible light bending when a background quasar (quasi-stellar object) is directly aligned with a foreground galaxy, and especially with that galaxy's core. This "cross" is an interesting example of a gravitational lens, because there appear to be five full lenses at one location. This unusual object indicates that there may also be four areas of dark matter near the core, each capturing and fully focusing some quasar light, making what appears to us as a cross.
Now that we see there are two simultaneous phenomena occurring during a solar eclipse, relative to changes in gravity on Earth, let us see exactly what is happening during solar eclipses:
There is a vast and equal net flow from all directions of the multiverse of gravitons and their associated YY particles, traveling at "c" or below. Nearly all of these particles pass through our bodies in the many trillions every second. A tiny number are absorbed or deflected by baryonic matter. Net push interactions with normal/baryonic matter establish gravitational force.
Some slower-frequency particles passing near massive objects (such as planets, large moons, stars, and star clusters) will be coherently directed partially around, and thereby focused AS IF there were a boost of energy in the quasar's light. That is the lens effect. The focused flow of primary particles (only a few of which are in visible light, and most of which are gravitons), pushes harder on what is directly ahead, along the Sun-Moon-totality line. In our case, our gravity/weight tends to slightly increase, and pendulums swing slightly faster.
Bottom line: Regular push gravity forces are always in effect from all directions, but the lensed invisible push effect is slightly greater than the ongoing decreased push effect from net particle flows.
It is tempting to suggest that General Relativity (GR) could explain solar eclipses as well as does Graviton Gravity (GG). However, that equality is not so. Thus dissolves the GR world view:
First, GR has already been disproved by its failure to explain phenomena on a very large scale, even though in the nearby everyday world it looks like graviton gravity. Either a theory is right, or wrong, in all scales of the real world. Science moves on.
Second, we can see gravitational lenses on a very large scale, but nobody has shown them working on the scale of a body as small as our Moon. Even if the Sun does exhibit this effect on photons all the time (but the Moon's lesser mass cannot) then there would be no Allais effect during solar eclipses.
Third, visible light has just the mass and energy to nicely form gravitational lenses. Electromagnetism at extremely high energy frequencies is much less affected by push gravity. At lower electromagnetic energies associated with significantly less than "c" mass/energy objects in the stream, their mass is high enough to be strongly affected by multiversal push streams. We would not see these flows as lenses. We could only measure them in this situation by their slight increase in our net gravity.
Fourth, as a last resort, defenders of GR can point out that not all tests of the Allais effect have found anything anomalous. Interestingly, whereas there have been several affirming results, there have never been any contradicting results showing decreased gravity. Therefore, the burden of proof regarding the Allais effect's true nature lies more on the defenders of GR than on the defenders of push/shadow gravity.
Comment:.....the burden of proof, yes, so*.
*Could we still expand our thought, and think that Le Sage's push gravity or the gravitons would be some original force in the universe, like Lord Balarama, and the quintessential winds would govern these forces maybe, or give a shelter from maybe pushing energies, like in the shadow gravity?? And what that means, that all the material universes are separated from each other by the waters of ahankara(waters of wrong sense of self, maybe quite close translation from sanskrit)?
*
*
*
*
https://www.newscientist.com/blog/space/2008/08/researchers-test-for-dips-in-gravity.html
https://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0408/0408023.pdf
Here is how they teach Keppe's disinverted physics in school in Brazil: http://www.keppemotor.com/institucional/interview-with-professor-euripes-alves/?lang=en
And all we have to remember, is, that: GURU is Always One, and He is heavy, and so giving bigger sheltering shadow in His lotus feet. PLEASE don't be just mental, it is all very clear when we slow down from our fearful neurosis, as simple human beings try to own everything and acts more like animals with reactions to multiply, defend, sleep, eat etc. that is not enough to make us human beings in the very meaning of the word human. It's called maya which wouldn't exist in reality only as a mirage. Demigod worship or asura or such should not be the ultimate way.
Krishna let them no more educate us to fear and lies, to fearful neurosis. But still, ok, it's kali-yuga, and it's fairy tales. Remember Guru(not only the planet Jupiter)
Hare Rama
P.S. Who don't know yet, Balarama is Krishna's big brother, The Eternity sat, gravity, Ananta Shesa keeping all planets on their orbits, and everyone's little wrong sense of self is an expansion from His Potencies. And it is said, that, this universe resides like a small drop of water on one of Ananta Shesa's hoods. Ananta Shesa, is The One Whom is always worshipped by Lord Shiva.
!!Always Chant!!
Hare Kṛṣṇa Hare Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare
::!And Stay High Forever!::
Hare Kṛṣṇa Hare Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare
::!And Stay High Forever!::
The very best youtube channel on "forbidden archeology": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsnakpt1vBY
The New Earth Channel; to get involved in the research, go here: http://megaliths.org/
One more thought: physics is to proof metaphysics right or maybe wrong, but never something to build metaphysics on. For the senses are imperfect.
The New Earth Channel; to get involved in the research, go here: http://megaliths.org/
One more thought: physics is to proof metaphysics right or maybe wrong, but never something to build metaphysics on. For the senses are imperfect.
|
|
|
1.4 EINSTEIN’S GEOMETRIC MODEL OF GRAVITY
On May 29, 1919, Albert Einstein supposedly proved “…that we live in a curved four-dimensional space-time” where space and time are somehow fused together into a “fabric.” He believed that an object such as the Earth spinning in space “…would drag space and time along with it…”, and that this space-time fabric curves inward around a planetary body. Thus, he said,
Gravity is no longer a mysterious force acting at a distance, but [rather is] the result of an object trying to travel in a straight line through space [that is] curved by the presence of material bodies.
Space that is curved? “Wait…isn’t space supposed to be empty?” you ask. How can you curve something that is empty? As we can see, the significant problem in visualizing Einstein’s gravity model is with the word “curve”, as this is something that a flat, elastic sheet would do.
Indeed, most attempts to visualize Einstein’s results picture planets as if they were weights that were depressing an imaginary flat rubber sheet that is stretched out in space as the “fabric” of space-time. An object such as a comet or asteroid simply follows the geometry of the sheet as it moves towards the Earth.
The problem with this model is that any curvature of space-time would need to be moving in towards a spherical object from all directions, not just a flat plane. And furthermore, one still requires a force of gravity to pull a weight down into a flat rubber sheet. In a weightless space, the ball and the sheet would simply float around together.
In reality, the word “flowing” is far more precise than “curving,” since in Convergence III we have demonstrated that gravity is actually a form of aetheric energy that is constantly flowing into an object.
The equations for gravity do not specify which direction it must flow in, simply that it exists as a force that is responsible for objects not flying away from the Earth’s surface. Such ideas can be traced to John Keely, Dr. Walter Russell and more recently Walter Wright with his well-established “Push Gravity” theory.
Once we establish that all force fields such as gravity and electromagnetism are simply different forms of aether/ZPE in motion, then we have an active source for gravity and a straightforward reason for why it would exist. We see that every molecule in the entire body of a planet must be sustained by an ongoing in-flow of aetheric energy.
The same energy that is creating the Earth is also creating and flowing into us. We are then caught up in the gigantic current of the river of energy that streams into the Earth, much as mosquitoes get stuck to a screen window while the air blows right through the screen.
Our bodies cannot travel through solid matter, but the current of aetheric energy certainly can – and this is one of the many things that Keely, Tesla, Kozyrev and others demonstrated. A star or planet must continually draw energy from its environment in order to “stay alive.” Kozyrev had made very similar conclusions about our Sun back in the 1950s, concluding that stars acted as “machines that convert the flow of time into heat and light.”
Almost all Western scientists believe that Einstein’s general and special relativity theories eliminate the need for an aether – and indeed, Einstein advocated the rejection of an aether in 1910, which is where mainstream science still believes his thoughts ended on the issue. However, in 1920, Einstein actually stated that “the hypothesis of the existence of the ether does not contradict the special theory of relativity.” And in 1924, he wrote,
…in theoretical physics, we cannot get along without the ether, i.e., a continuum assigned physical properties, because the general theory of relativity… excludes direct long-range action; and each theory of short-range action assumes the presence of continuous fields and, consequently, the existence of the ‘ether.’ [emphasis added]
1.5 TORSION PHYSICS
In 1913, Dr. Eli Cartan was the first to clearly demonstrate that the “fabric” (flow) of space and time in Einstein’s general theory of relativity not only “curved”, but it also possessed a spinning or spiraling movement within itself known as “torsion.”
This area of physics is typically referred to as Einstein-Cartan Theory, or ECT. Cartan’s theory wasn’t taken too seriously at the time, as it came out before the days of quantum physics, when elementary “particles” such as electrons were believed to rotate or “spin” as they orbited the nucleus.
Most people are unaware that it is now generally accepted that the space surrounding the Earth and perhaps the entire Galaxy has “right-handed spin,” meaning that energy will be influenced to spin clockwise as it travels through the physical vacuum. In 1996, Russian Drs. Akimov and Shipov wrote that:
To date, world periodicals reference to torsion fields amount to the order of 10,000 articles, belonging to about a hundred authors. Over one half of those theorists work in Russia alone.
As we shall easily see, Dr. Kozyrev’s work was the main influence for the more than 5,000 Russian papers on this subject as of 1996. In classical physics models, torsion fields were never considered to be a universal force on the level of gravity or electromagnetic energy, largely because they only existed theoretically.
Cartan’s original 1913 theory speculated that torsion fields would be some 30 orders of magnitude weaker than gravitation, and gravity is already known to be 40 orders of magnitude weaker than electromagnetic energy! With such a miniscule level of influence, so said the theories, the naturally-spinning “torsion fields” were basically an irrelevant footnote that would not make any noticeable contributions to the phenomena that we can observe in the universe.
For those scientists who had maintained an open mind, the works of Trautman, Kopczyynski, F. Hehl, T. Kibble, D. Sciama and others in the early 1970’s triggered a wave of interest in torsion fields. Hard scientific facts exploded Cartan’s 60-year-old theory-based myth that such fields were weak, tiny and unable to move through space.
The myth of the Einstein-Cartan theory was that the spiraling torsion fields could not move, (i.e. they would remain static,) and could only exist within a space far smaller than the atom.
Sciama et al. demonstrated that these basic torsion fields expected in ECT did exist, and they were referred to as “static torsion fields.” The difference was that “dynamic torsion fields” were demonstrated as well, with properties far more remarkable than Einstein and Cartan had assumed.
According to Sciama et al., static torsion fields are created from spinning sources that do not radiate any energy. However, once you have a spinning source that releases energy in any form, such as the Sun or the center of the Galaxy, and / or a spinning source that has more than one form of movement occurring at the same time, such as a planet that is rotating on its axis and revolving around the Sun at the same time, then dynamic torsion is automatically produced.
This phenomenon allows torsion waves to propagate through spaceinstead of simply staying in a single “static” spot. Thus, torsion fields, like gravity or electromagnetism, are capable of moving from one place to another in the Universe.
Furthermore, as we shall discover in later chapters, Kozyrev proved decades ago that these fields travel at “superluminal” speeds, meaning that they far exceed the speed of light.
If you can have an impulse that moves directly through the “fabric of space-time”, travels at super-luminal velocities and is separate from gravity or electromagnetism, you have a significant breakthrough in physics – one that demands that a “physical vacuum”, “zero-point energy” or “aether” must really exist.
1.6 MASTER LIST OF PHENOMENA THAT CREATE KOZYREV’S EFFECTS
Kozyrev’s experiments began in the 1950s and were conducted since the 1970s with the ongoing assistance of Dr. V.V. Nasonov, who helped to standardize the laboratory methods and the statistical analysis of the results.
It is important to remember that these experiments were conducted under the strictest conditions, repeated in hundreds or in many cases thousands of trials, and were written about in extensive mathematical detail. They have been rigorously peer-reviewed, and Lavrentyev and others have replicated the results independently.
(We have omitted the mathematical / analytical analyses of Kozyrev’s results in this book to enhance its readability.) Certain specially-made detectors using rotation and vibration were designed that would react in the presence of torsion fields, which Kozyrev called the “flow of time.”
If we go back to our earlier analogy, we said that matter behaved somewhat like a sponge in water. If we do something to disturb the structure of the sponge, such as to squeeze it, spin it or vibrate it, then it will release some of its water back into its environment. Over the years, all of the following processes were discovered to create a “time flow” of torsion waves in the laboratory, due to their disruption of matter in some form:
Other than the perplexing final item related to consciousness, we can readily see how each process is disturbing matter in some way, thus causing it to absorb or release minute amounts of its aetheric “water,” which fits perfectly with our sponge analogy.
Even more importantly, the fact that strong emotional energy could also cause a measurable at-a-distance reaction has been repeatedly documented, not just by Dr. Kozyrev but many others, and this is where our concepts of psychic phenomena and consciousness come into the picture.
from: http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/books-free-online/20-the-divine-cosmos/95-the-divine-cosmos-chapter-01-the-breakthroughs-of-dr-na-kozyrev
On May 29, 1919, Albert Einstein supposedly proved “…that we live in a curved four-dimensional space-time” where space and time are somehow fused together into a “fabric.” He believed that an object such as the Earth spinning in space “…would drag space and time along with it…”, and that this space-time fabric curves inward around a planetary body. Thus, he said,
Gravity is no longer a mysterious force acting at a distance, but [rather is] the result of an object trying to travel in a straight line through space [that is] curved by the presence of material bodies.
Space that is curved? “Wait…isn’t space supposed to be empty?” you ask. How can you curve something that is empty? As we can see, the significant problem in visualizing Einstein’s gravity model is with the word “curve”, as this is something that a flat, elastic sheet would do.
Indeed, most attempts to visualize Einstein’s results picture planets as if they were weights that were depressing an imaginary flat rubber sheet that is stretched out in space as the “fabric” of space-time. An object such as a comet or asteroid simply follows the geometry of the sheet as it moves towards the Earth.
The problem with this model is that any curvature of space-time would need to be moving in towards a spherical object from all directions, not just a flat plane. And furthermore, one still requires a force of gravity to pull a weight down into a flat rubber sheet. In a weightless space, the ball and the sheet would simply float around together.
In reality, the word “flowing” is far more precise than “curving,” since in Convergence III we have demonstrated that gravity is actually a form of aetheric energy that is constantly flowing into an object.
The equations for gravity do not specify which direction it must flow in, simply that it exists as a force that is responsible for objects not flying away from the Earth’s surface. Such ideas can be traced to John Keely, Dr. Walter Russell and more recently Walter Wright with his well-established “Push Gravity” theory.
Once we establish that all force fields such as gravity and electromagnetism are simply different forms of aether/ZPE in motion, then we have an active source for gravity and a straightforward reason for why it would exist. We see that every molecule in the entire body of a planet must be sustained by an ongoing in-flow of aetheric energy.
The same energy that is creating the Earth is also creating and flowing into us. We are then caught up in the gigantic current of the river of energy that streams into the Earth, much as mosquitoes get stuck to a screen window while the air blows right through the screen.
Our bodies cannot travel through solid matter, but the current of aetheric energy certainly can – and this is one of the many things that Keely, Tesla, Kozyrev and others demonstrated. A star or planet must continually draw energy from its environment in order to “stay alive.” Kozyrev had made very similar conclusions about our Sun back in the 1950s, concluding that stars acted as “machines that convert the flow of time into heat and light.”
Almost all Western scientists believe that Einstein’s general and special relativity theories eliminate the need for an aether – and indeed, Einstein advocated the rejection of an aether in 1910, which is where mainstream science still believes his thoughts ended on the issue. However, in 1920, Einstein actually stated that “the hypothesis of the existence of the ether does not contradict the special theory of relativity.” And in 1924, he wrote,
…in theoretical physics, we cannot get along without the ether, i.e., a continuum assigned physical properties, because the general theory of relativity… excludes direct long-range action; and each theory of short-range action assumes the presence of continuous fields and, consequently, the existence of the ‘ether.’ [emphasis added]
1.5 TORSION PHYSICS
In 1913, Dr. Eli Cartan was the first to clearly demonstrate that the “fabric” (flow) of space and time in Einstein’s general theory of relativity not only “curved”, but it also possessed a spinning or spiraling movement within itself known as “torsion.”
This area of physics is typically referred to as Einstein-Cartan Theory, or ECT. Cartan’s theory wasn’t taken too seriously at the time, as it came out before the days of quantum physics, when elementary “particles” such as electrons were believed to rotate or “spin” as they orbited the nucleus.
Most people are unaware that it is now generally accepted that the space surrounding the Earth and perhaps the entire Galaxy has “right-handed spin,” meaning that energy will be influenced to spin clockwise as it travels through the physical vacuum. In 1996, Russian Drs. Akimov and Shipov wrote that:
To date, world periodicals reference to torsion fields amount to the order of 10,000 articles, belonging to about a hundred authors. Over one half of those theorists work in Russia alone.
As we shall easily see, Dr. Kozyrev’s work was the main influence for the more than 5,000 Russian papers on this subject as of 1996. In classical physics models, torsion fields were never considered to be a universal force on the level of gravity or electromagnetic energy, largely because they only existed theoretically.
Cartan’s original 1913 theory speculated that torsion fields would be some 30 orders of magnitude weaker than gravitation, and gravity is already known to be 40 orders of magnitude weaker than electromagnetic energy! With such a miniscule level of influence, so said the theories, the naturally-spinning “torsion fields” were basically an irrelevant footnote that would not make any noticeable contributions to the phenomena that we can observe in the universe.
For those scientists who had maintained an open mind, the works of Trautman, Kopczyynski, F. Hehl, T. Kibble, D. Sciama and others in the early 1970’s triggered a wave of interest in torsion fields. Hard scientific facts exploded Cartan’s 60-year-old theory-based myth that such fields were weak, tiny and unable to move through space.
The myth of the Einstein-Cartan theory was that the spiraling torsion fields could not move, (i.e. they would remain static,) and could only exist within a space far smaller than the atom.
Sciama et al. demonstrated that these basic torsion fields expected in ECT did exist, and they were referred to as “static torsion fields.” The difference was that “dynamic torsion fields” were demonstrated as well, with properties far more remarkable than Einstein and Cartan had assumed.
According to Sciama et al., static torsion fields are created from spinning sources that do not radiate any energy. However, once you have a spinning source that releases energy in any form, such as the Sun or the center of the Galaxy, and / or a spinning source that has more than one form of movement occurring at the same time, such as a planet that is rotating on its axis and revolving around the Sun at the same time, then dynamic torsion is automatically produced.
This phenomenon allows torsion waves to propagate through spaceinstead of simply staying in a single “static” spot. Thus, torsion fields, like gravity or electromagnetism, are capable of moving from one place to another in the Universe.
Furthermore, as we shall discover in later chapters, Kozyrev proved decades ago that these fields travel at “superluminal” speeds, meaning that they far exceed the speed of light.
If you can have an impulse that moves directly through the “fabric of space-time”, travels at super-luminal velocities and is separate from gravity or electromagnetism, you have a significant breakthrough in physics – one that demands that a “physical vacuum”, “zero-point energy” or “aether” must really exist.
1.6 MASTER LIST OF PHENOMENA THAT CREATE KOZYREV’S EFFECTS
Kozyrev’s experiments began in the 1950s and were conducted since the 1970s with the ongoing assistance of Dr. V.V. Nasonov, who helped to standardize the laboratory methods and the statistical analysis of the results.
It is important to remember that these experiments were conducted under the strictest conditions, repeated in hundreds or in many cases thousands of trials, and were written about in extensive mathematical detail. They have been rigorously peer-reviewed, and Lavrentyev and others have replicated the results independently.
(We have omitted the mathematical / analytical analyses of Kozyrev’s results in this book to enhance its readability.) Certain specially-made detectors using rotation and vibration were designed that would react in the presence of torsion fields, which Kozyrev called the “flow of time.”
If we go back to our earlier analogy, we said that matter behaved somewhat like a sponge in water. If we do something to disturb the structure of the sponge, such as to squeeze it, spin it or vibrate it, then it will release some of its water back into its environment. Over the years, all of the following processes were discovered to create a “time flow” of torsion waves in the laboratory, due to their disruption of matter in some form:
- the deforming of a physical object
- the encounter of an air jet with an obstacle
- the operation of an hourglass filled with sand
- the absorption of light
- friction
- burning
- the actions of an observer, such as a movement of the head
- the heating or cooling of an object
- phase transitions in substances (frozen to liquid, liquid to vapor, etc.)
- dissolving and mixing substances
- the fading death of plants
- non-light radiation from astronomical objects
- sudden changes in human consciousness
Other than the perplexing final item related to consciousness, we can readily see how each process is disturbing matter in some way, thus causing it to absorb or release minute amounts of its aetheric “water,” which fits perfectly with our sponge analogy.
Even more importantly, the fact that strong emotional energy could also cause a measurable at-a-distance reaction has been repeatedly documented, not just by Dr. Kozyrev but many others, and this is where our concepts of psychic phenomena and consciousness come into the picture.
from: http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/books-free-online/20-the-divine-cosmos/95-the-divine-cosmos-chapter-01-the-breakthroughs-of-dr-na-kozyrev
* Anjana Suta Academy
....led Talpade to read Swami Dayanand Saraswati's works related to ancient aeronautics, such as ‘Rigvedādic Bhāshya Bhumikā’ and ‘Rigved and Yajurveda Bhāshya’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivkar_Bapuji_Talpade
....led Talpade to read Swami Dayanand Saraswati's works related to ancient aeronautics, such as ‘Rigvedādic Bhāshya Bhumikā’ and ‘Rigved and Yajurveda Bhāshya’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivkar_Bapuji_Talpade
